Now that i have given the brief answer, i will address the situation at (much) greater length dropping the atomic bombs was the only way to get the japanese to stop fighting us the people who argue against the use of bombs seem to have no idea of the circumstances of their use and no idea of what the alternatives were. Should the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki be considered a necessary action to end the war, or a needless and disproportionate one. Few issues in american history - perhaps only slavery itself - are as charged as the dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was it if the us wanted to prevent russia from occupying territory in east asia the way it had occupied territory in eastern europe, it needed to end the war as quickly as possible. Were the atomic bombs necessary for ending the conflict with japan during world war ii undoubtedly, most us citizens since the atomic bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki on aug 6 and aug 9, 1945, have firmly believed that they were justified moreover, most people in the us seem to think that the. More than seventy years after the end of world war ii, the decision to drop the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki remains controversial historians and the public continue to debate if the bombings were justified, the causes of japan's surrender, the casualties that would have resulted if the us had. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought japan to her knees and ended the horrible war if the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children. The use of the atomic bombs on nagasaki and hiroshima was a justifiable action for the united states to end the pacific war with japan this. The bomb dropped on hiroshima on aug 6, 1945, killed thousands instantly and about 140,000 by the end of the year nagasaki was hit on aug 9 and japan surrendered six days later a majority of americans see the bombings as having been necessary to end the war and save us and japanese lives,.
The documents can help readers to make up their own minds about long- standing controversies such as whether the first use of atomic weapons was justified, whether president harry s truman had alternatives to atomic attacks for ending the war, and what the impact of the soviet declaration of war on japan was. In the years since the two atomic bombs were dropped on japan, a number of historians have suggested that the weapons had a two-pronged objective first, of course, was to bring the war with japan to a speedy end and spare american lives it has been suggested that the second objective was to demonstrate the new. Necessity of dropping the atomic bomb to end world war ii 635 words | 3 pages that the atomic bomb was necessary to force the japanese army to finally surrender and avoid a costly and heavy casualty war with japan on august 6, 1945, the united states dropped the first atomic bomb over hiroshima, japan. Both nations were in a state of war at the time the bomb was used, and it brought an end to that war without sacrificing the lives of americans war is hell, and the unfortunate use of it was justified obama should however reiterate that nuclear weapons should never be used again, promote non-proliferation.
In 1945, the united states dropped two atomic bombs on japan, ending world war ii the manhattan project was the us government program during world war ii that developed and built these first atomic bombs detonation of these first nuclear was the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki necessary truman's. In their genocidal actions against targeted people, hitler, stalin, mao, and pol pot had as their objective the total elimination of a whole people the killing would only stop when every last pursued person was exterminated truman's motivation in dropping the bombs was to end the war, not to eliminate the. Us officials did not debate at length whether to use the atomic bomb against japan, but argued that it was a means to a faster end to the pacific conflict that and nagasaki was intended to gain a stronger position for postwar diplomatic bargaining with the soviet union, as the weapons themselves were not needed to.
For years, historians have asked: were the atomic bombs necessary for the united states to achieve total victory over the japanese empire were the bombs justifiable given that the war was coming to a close by 1945 finally, and most importantly, did more peaceful and less destructive alternatives exist. In 1991, according to a detroit free press survey conducted in both japan and the us, 63% of americans said the atomic bomb attacks on japan were a justified means of ending the war, while only 29% thought the action was unjustified at the same time, only 29% of japanese said the bombing was.
Aug 6 and aug 9 marked the 65th anniversaries of the dropping of the atomic bombs on the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki these events not only brought about the surrender of the japan and an end to world war ii, but they also helped shaped the nature of.
It was necessary because the us had a duty to their citizens and they used the atomic bomb to make the people happy peoples feelings especially when they are the enemy, it needed to be done because we needed to end the war and save our american troops lives and give them what they deserved from pearl harbor. Despite strong evidence that the atomic bombings were not responsible for ending the war with japan, most americans, particularly those who lived through world war ii, believe that they were many world war ii era servicemen who were in the pacific or anticipated being shipped there believed that the.
Us president barack obama will be visiting hiroshima on friday, the first sitting american president to do so since the us dropped an atomic bomb on the city 71 years ago at the heart of this narrative lay the assertion that the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki were not necessary to end the war. Abby reflects on the dropping of atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki and explains why this wasn't a necessary action in order to end world war ii like br. As barack obama becomes the first sitting us president to visit hiroshima, should the united states apologise for dropping the atomic bombs on japan the mainstream view of the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki in 1945 is that it was needed to force japan to surrender and bring an end to the war,.