5 quotes have been tagged as pascal-s-wager: blaise pascal: 'belief is a wise wager granted that faith cannot be proved, what harm will come to you if y. How to refute pascal's wager pascal's wager has been one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of religious belief many theists have used it, to their knowledge or not however it's far from impeccable consequently it can be. Pascal's wager in the seventeenth century the mathematician blaise pascal formulated his infamous pragmatic argument for belief in god in pensées the argument runs as follows: if you erroneously believe in god, you lose nothing ( assuming that death is the absolute end), whereas if you correctly believe in god, you. I can't remember exactly when it was that i learned about pascal's wager 17th- century french philosopher blaise pascal postulated that it is rational behavior to believe in god why believe in something for which there is no evidence the answer lies in decision theory if you believe in god and you're.
Pascal's triangle blaise pascal (1623-62) was a french mathematician and theologian pascal's triangle is wonderful example of why mathematics is often referred to as the science of pattern warm up the tok class by putting a hl math student on the spot ask them to: a explain the pattern of the triangle b remind the. Fingers crossed: pascal reasoned that life is a sort of “game,” and that our faith in god, or lack-there-of, is our wager as to. In 1670, the french mathematician and christian philosopher, blaise pascal, published a collection of theological work titled “thoughts”, in which he put for.
The famous “pascal's wager” asks us to consider the question of the existence of god as a wager which is the better bet—belief or disbelief. Taking pascal's wager: faith, evidence and the abundant life [michael rota] on amazoncom free shipping on qualifying offers world magazine's best books of 2016 short list christianity today's 2017 book of the year award of merit - apologetics/evangelism since we can't know with absolute certainty that god. Pascal's wager, practical argument for belief in god formulated by blaise pascal in his pensées (1657–58), pascal posed the following argument to show that belief in the christian religion is rational: if the christian god does not exist, the agnostic loses little by believing in him and gains correspondingly little by not. Thinking about pascal's wager helps us clarify our relationship with god the wager is not simple in its true complexity, it is a wise and sobering challenge but in its popular simplicity, it becomes misleading the wager goes like this.
That means that even if you found pascal's wager otherwise convincing you would have to choose under thousands of gods and have a very high chance to choose the wrong one belief is not a conscious decision even if you were convinced by pascal's argument, you could not simply declare yourself theist and believe. Pascal's wager 343 [6–233] infinity nothingness our soul has been cast into the body, where it finds number, time and dimension it reasons thereupon, and calls it nature, necessity, and can believe nothing else unity added to infinity adds nothing to it, any more than does one foot added to infinite length the finite is. Blaise pascal1 is the 17th century scientist and christian who was recognized in having the unit of pressure named after him, the pascal2 atmospheric pressure in weather reports is often reported in kilopascals blaise, as with many thinkers of his era, was also a philosopher and theologian pascal's wager, which he used. Pascal's wager is the name given to an argument put forward by the french philosopher and mathematician blaise pascal in the 17th century his argument for belief in god was based not on an appeal to evidence that god exists, but rather on the idea that it is in our own interests to believe in god and it is therefore.
I hesitate to include pascal's argument of the wager in that domain of philosophy called natural theology pascal himself, who thought that all of philosophy was not worth an hour's pain ( pensées , 79), almost certainly would have objected to such characterization pascal's apologetics does not counter reason with reason. “pascal's wager” is the name given to an argument due to blaise pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in god the name is somewhat misleading, for in a single section of his pensées, pascal apparently presents at least three such arguments, each of which might be called a. Pascal's wager has been betted on for three-and-a-half centuries was he asking the right question.
To believe or not to believe pascal put the question as a wager but he committed his own gambler's fallacy. Part of the crowd that pascal hung around with before his conversion did all the things he later identified as diversion: hunting, partying, but especially gambling pascal himself is often credited with inventing roulette so it's not surprising that he uses the device of a wager to try to convince people, who are already gambling,. Fallacious argument trotted out by religious believers, particularly in the judeo- christian tradition, in favour of belief in divinity the argument goes as follows: you may either believe in god or not, and he may or may not actually exist if you believe in him, it is irrelevant if he doesn't exist (and by extension there is no afterlife).
The most powerful objection to pascal's wager is the so-called many gods objection the objection concedes that it makes sense to think of the problem as a problem about practical rationality, and it does not quarrel with pascal's assumption that the christian god rewards belief and punishes disbelief as we have. This is what's known as pascal's wager, since it argues that it's your best bet to believe in god (pascal wrote of the christian god, but this same argument could apply to any god) if god doesn't exist and you behave as if he does, you haven't lost much—just some sleep on sunday and a few opportunities. The logic of pascal's wager ian hacking jpasca&s wager is the name of some game theoretic considerations that concern belief in god1 i shall show that pascal briefly presents three distinct arguments, each with different prem isses in each case, the conclusion does follow from the premisses in each. Pascal's wager god is or he is notlet us weigh the gain and the loss in choosing'god is' if you gain, you gain all, if you lose, you lose nothing wager, then, unhesitatingly, that he is references: erickson, g w and fossa, j a dictionary of paradox lanham, md: university press of america, pp 150-151, 1998.